1 Kings 21:1-21a

Psalm 5

Galatians 2:15-21

Luke 7:36-8:3

Mt. Zion UMC, Stokesdale, NC

17 June 2007

The Other Side of Division

 

          In my senior year of high school, I had the opportunity to play in the pit-orchestra for the school’s musical production of The Student Prince.  The Student Prince is the story of a nineteenth century German prince who goes “undercover” as a common college student at Heidelberg University.  The prince simply wanted to experience the typical life of one of his subjects.  While at school, he joins a fraternity, develops close friendships, and falls in love.  The problem is, is that the prince joins the “commoners’” fraternity, develops close friendships with the common students, and falls in love with a waitress and not a princess.  During the climax of the musical, after being revealed as royalty, the waitress turns down the prince’s offer of marriage because it would be socially inappropriate for a common waitress to marry a prince.  The prince then threatens to renounce his claim to the throne so he can marry the waitress.  Such a thing is simply not done is that society!  Yet by the end of the show, the prince is able to retain his royalty and still marry the waitress.  It’s such a beautiful ending to a very popular story plot: a love so strong that it breaks societal norms in order to exist. 

          This plot of love being so strong that it overcomes and breaks the rules of what the community deems as normal is very popular with us.  The Student Prince is not the only show with such a scene of love conquering societal norms; the 1988 Eddie Murphy film Coming to America has just such a scene.  Some of Shakespeare’s plays also contain such a plot; Romeo and Juliet both broke the rules of their community for the sake of their love.  Even the Bible is filled with similar stories.  In 2 Samuel chapter 6, David dances joyfully before the recovered Ark of the Covenant.  He danced in such a way that was unbecoming of a king – but he danced this way to honor God and to show the joy and love he had for God.  Even the central tenet of Christianity, God coming to earth as a human to not only live with us but also to die for us, has the same overtones.  It’s love overcoming the natural order and normal rules of society to express itself.  Our reading from Saint Luke’s Gospel is just such a story.

          The scene opens with Jesus being invited to dinner at Simon the Pharisee's house.  Now, this was not simply Simon saying, "Hey Jesus, why don't you come on over to my house tonight and my wife will whip up her special dinner."  No, in the Roman world, particularly first century Palestine, when a wealthy person held a dinner, it was really more of a community affair.  Dinners were often held in the house's courtyard.  The low-lying table or even just a nice sheet placed on the ground like a pick-nick.  Those who received official invitations to the dinner would recline around the table or sheet.  They would lie on cushions around the meal, propping themselves up with their left arms while they ate with their right arms.  Their heads would be towards the meal while their feet would be facing away from the meal.  Now, there were many more people present at the dinner than just those invited.  I’m not talking about the servants; anybody off the street could walk into the courtyard and observe the dinner.  You see, these kind of dinners were affairs where important discussions would take place.  People would come to listen to the discussions of the host and guests.

          So, what does all this mean?  Well, for one thing, it’s much easier to see how the woman could walk up behind Jesus to wash and anoint his feet.  She would have been allowed into the house with all those who had come to watch and listen.  Jesus’ feet would not have been under a chair but behind him as he lounged around the meal.  Yet, what she did broke societal norms.  She, being not only a common woman but also a woman known as a sinner in the community, would under no circumstances touch a man of Jesus’ stature – let alone do such a thing like wash and anoint his feet at a Pharisee’s house.  After all, to wash and anoint a guest’s feet was an honor done only at the digression of the host.  This woman essentially insulted Jesus by merely touching him.

          Simon, the Pharisee, points this out.  He makes some assumptions as he makes his point.  First, he assumes that if Jesus is a prophet, Jesus would know what kind of woman she is.  He assumes correctly.  Jesus did know what kind of woman she was.  Next, Simon assumes that if Jesus knows what kind of woman she is, Jesus certainly would not allow her to touch him.  Here, Simon is wrong.  Jesus not only knew who this woman was, but he also knew her motivation for breaking these societal rules.  He knows that she was doing this out of love and thanksgiving.  In response to Simon’s accusation, Jesus tells a parable about the master who forgave his servants debts.  Both servants had substantial debts.  However, one had a debt much larger than the other.  The point was, that the servant with the larger debt had more forgiven and thus may have been more grateful.

          The parallel between the parable and the real life event is clear.  Both Simon and the woman needed Christ’s forgiveness.  As Simon was a Pharisee who kept the law, his “spiritual debt” was seen as being less than the woman who was a known sinner.  Truthfully, both were in need of Christ’s forgiveness.  After all, both servants owed money.  To put things in perspective, the average laborer in first century Palestine earned one denarii a day.  So regardless if one owed 50 denarii or 500 denarii, to have either debt forgiven was a big deal.  Both debts left unpaid would leave the debtor in a great deal of trouble.

          So, who are you in this story?  Who are we in this story?  When I asked myself who I was in this story, I had to admit that I was not always the woman rejoicing in the love and grace I’d received through Jesus Christ.  Sometimes I’m Simon the Pharisee; sometimes I can get so focused on what culture says is appropriate that I miss the true expression of love and grace before me.  It can be so easy to be persuaded by society, by the world, that we miss opportunities to not only experience God, but to also fulfill our part as the body of Christ in this world.  Sometimes we can be so focused on the divisions created by society that we neglect to see how God has called us to overcome and reconcile the divisions.  Simon only saw the socially created division that would keep this woman distanced from Jesus; he did not see the grace and love that Jesus offered by allowing this woman to cross through the divide. 

          Often, we are faced with the decision between being Simon the Pharisee or the woman the sinner.  We’re faced with this decision when we face such things as racism, sexism, and ageism.  We’re faced with this decision when we find ourselves in situations where we can offer reconciliation.  We’re humans, we have divisions between us.  Some divisions are between groups in the larger society and world.  Some divisions are even caused by disagreements between those who love each other, or at least are supposed to love each other.  Our culture has influenced us in how these divisions are to be handled.  Culture teaches us that when we’ve been hurt or attacked, we must retaliate.  Now there’s even the understanding of pre-emptive attacks; hurt others before they can hurt us.  There’s a mentality of taking others to court when you feel they’ve done something to you.  Have you heard about that judge in the Washington D.C. area who’s suing that dry cleaner for millions of dollars because they accidentally lost his pants?  It’s absurd!  Yet, that‘s the kind of mentality that our culture encourages us to have.  Culture dictates to us to observe these divisions and to take certain actions just as culture dictated to the woman to not wash and anoint Jesus’ feet.

          The concept of forgiveness is really a foreign concept in our culture today.  Vengeance, pay-back, punishment, lawsuits, grudges… these are typically how culture tells us to handle division, disagreements, and the accidents of the world.  After all, it would be said that the master in the parable did not have very good business sense by simply forgiving both of the servants their debt.  Wouldn’t negotiating a payment plan be a better option for the master according the world and the economy?  Maintaining division is what society dictates.  But God came to earth in Jesus Christ to bridge division, not to maintain the culturally constructed divisions.  That’s a big part of the ministry that our youth missions team will conduct.  They will be going to places and working with people that they most likely would not otherwise come into contact with because of social status.  That’s a big part of our mission as the Church.  We’re to go to those whom society deems as unapproachable or unworthy.  Who are those people around us?  Who are the unapproachable?  Who are the unworthy?  They may be of a different ethnic background, they may be those neighbors that “you just don’t socialize with,” they may be inmates, they may be the sick, they may be the poor, they may be just like that woman who was known as a sinner, they may be someone whom you don’t get along with or are even angry with.  They’re always the person on the other side of a divide.

          So, where do you see division in your life?  Where do you see division in your relationships?  Where do you see division between us?  Who’s on the other side of that division?  Christ bridged the great division to reconcile with us.  Now it’s our turn.

SDG